Mediator – Jeremy Richards

Complex Financial Disputes Resolved with Precision

As a seasoned bankruptcy litigator turned mediator, Jeremy Richards focuses on the intersection of legal merits and economic reality: understanding both the strengths and weaknesses of claims and the feasible paths to recovery is essential to achieving efficient and effective resolution.

Learn More

Years Experience
0 +

PRACTICE AREAS

Where Scarcity Meets Strategy

Jeremy has navigated disputes across every major industry -entertainment, mass tort, manufacturing, distribution, retail, and intellectual property-where strategic allocation of value can mean the difference between recovery and loss to both disputants.

Areas of Focus

Bankruptcy & Insolvency Disputes

Partnership & Corporate Dissolutions

Creditor Enforcement Actions

Fraud & Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Complex Commercial Litigation

Asset Recovery Actions

Valuation Disputes

THE APPROACH

When Questions Relating to Recovery Demand Clear Analysis

In complex business and financial disputes, parties often disagree about more than the facts and the law; they disagree about what’s genuinely or effectively collectible. Those disagreements can take many forms; disputes over: available assets; the claims of other creditors; the cost and complexity of enforcement; the value of assets and businesses; and the disparity in recovery between enforcement now and recovery over time from a going concern.



Drawing on 44 years of experience and thousands of complex matters in which these issues were often material considerations, Jeremy brings analytical rigor to both sides of the equation: helping claimants assess the true economics of their position and helping respondents assert theirs with evidence, not assertions. Both sides benefit from the same thing: clear-eyed analysis of what litigation will cost, what collection genuinely entails, and what each party’s realistic alternatives look like. Jeremy facilitates that analysis without tilting the scales-keeping in mind that enforcement and liquidation may not always lead to the best result for either side to a dispute.

After 44 years practicing bankruptcy and bankruptcy litigation, I know that the most effective and lasting resolution happens when all parties face economic reality with equal rigor. When parties look beyond enforcement to what can be preserved and strengthened, the outcomes are often better for everyone.

Jeremy Richards

Mediator · Richards ADR

THE FRAMEWORK

Precision Over Process

Complex financial disputes get distilled to the essential questions that drive resolution:


At the core of many financial disputes is a fundamental question: is the value of what exists today as a functioning enterprise, an ongoing relationship, or an intact asset base greater than what any party would recover through enforcement and liquidation? When the answer is yes, resolution isn’t about compromise; it’s about preserving and enhancing value that aggressive litigation would otherwise destroy.


This approach isn’t about favoring one side or splitting differences. It’s about applying the same analytical precision to every party’s position, so everyone works from the same reality and, where the economics support it, finding paths that maximize the outcomes for all parties.

What are the legal merits?

Evaluating the foundational strength of each claim to understand leverage and risk before costs escalate.

What are the material facts?

Separating emotion and posturing from the verifiable data that will ultimately dictate the outcome in court or mediation.

What is the genuine collection landscape?

Applying analytical precision to determine what is actually recoverable—identifying available assets and navigating the claims of other creditors.

What will litigation and enforcement cost?

Assessing whether a hard-fought legal victory will actually translate into tangible, real-world economic recovery.

How effective will it be?

Grounding every negotiation in economic reality so all parties work from the same factual foundation to find a viable path forward.

When assertions are made about resources or obstacles, what do the facts support?

Grounding every negotiation in economic reality so all parties work from the same factual foundation to find a viable path forward.

GET IN TOUCH

Let’s Chart Your Path Forward

When financial complexity meets disputed resources, you need a mediator who brings the same analytical rigor to every party’s position, helping all sides navigate toward the resolution that best preserves and maximizes value.